Home

What'snew

Links

Guestbook

Poems

Essay

Quotes

Photos

Travels

Discussion

Resume

Credits 

Refer

this site

 

 

 

 



    The following is an essay I submitted for my Psychology class when I was in junior college. If you're a chat addict or used to be a chat addict like myself, chances are, you might find yourself agreeing to some of the statements below.

     As I was reading the last few paragraphs of the article “Were You Born that Way” regarding the possibility of “tinkering with one’s genes” in the future, to produce a desirable trait or physical feature even before one is born, I cannot help but observe that in this modern technological world, we are already somehow tinkering with “how we were born” through deliberate deception and pretension of who we are really not. This, I can see particularly in the huge popularity Internet chatting has obtained for several years. A person who has a modem, PC and internet connection can already communicate with a limitless amount of strangers at the same time from all over the world, pretending to be someone he or she is not,  possibly making up how he/she really looks.

     I used to strongly oppose the proliferation of “cyber romance” or the establishment of a romantic relationship via the Internet. I thought that cyber romance or at least deep friendship defied all the conventional forms of courtship/intimacy and solely communicating verbally could not make up for the other elements in a friendship/romance that was so apparently lacking when chatting (things such as holding hands, facial expressions etc.) I held on to this belief until I myself got immersed and managed to establish close relationships with certain people primarily and solely through chatting. I discovered that most adolescents and young adults are at the stage wherein the need for intimacy is seemingly most pronounced. Surprisingly, this need for intimacy CAN actually be fulfilled merely by typing words on the screen, facing the monitor, wondering who is it really you are chatting with on the other end.    

     More than anything else, I have realized for myself the truth in what I learned from Social Psychology: Anonymity can release both playfulness and intimacy. Playfulness can extend from mere flirting to outright deception to extreme form of violence or intimidation (such as cases of stalking). However, the other side of the coin, intimacy, is what makes chatting an excellent avenue for releasing both negative and positive emotions, if not for establishing friendships or finding your perfect match in the long-run. In other words, it may be easier to both lie and to be honest in chatting. The two extremes are more likely to occur in the face of anonymity.

     Perhaps this will always be the paradox of chatting for me. It has become my addiction and source of “release” because I am more willing to open up with some strangers I met, who eventually became my most trusted confidante. However, it has also been a source of confusion and alarm for me at times; just as I can “tinker” with what I have, who I am, how I really look like, so can others do the same. It does not take a scientist to “toy” with our or others’ personalities and looks—at least for the time being, while almost everyone is hooked online.

Copyright © 1999 by Catherine Ongking. All rights reserved. Should you wish to quote the whole of or any part of this essay, please email me at <cathyongking@edsamail.com.ph>

Comments? Suggestions? Please e-mail me at the above address.